Lead Outreach Agent
Comparison

A Lusha alternative without the credit-reveal tax

Lusha is a browser-extension contact database priced by credits, where an email costs one credit and a phone number costs ten. Lead Outreach Agent works differently: describe the businesses you want, and it searches public sources, keeps only leads with a real public email or phone, explains why each fits, and drafts a first message you can edit before sending.

Free to start · 200 credits · No credit card · Zero-result searches refunded

At a glance Lusha alternative, in one line A niche-first way to get public, contactable leads and a first draft - without paying ten credits to reveal a phone number that might be wrong.
  • No per-reveal credit tax
  • Public source on every lead
  • AI-drafted first email included
Workflow preview

See the workflow before starting a search

Review the actual search setup and result format before spending credits or starting a campaign.

Lead Outreach Agent search form showing niche, country, lead type, and credit estimate
Step 1: define the lead search by niche, lead type, country, and campaign notes.
Lead Outreach Agent results table showing contactable leads, public email and phone signals, and draft outreach context
Step 2: review contactable leads, match reasons, public contact routes, and editable outreach drafts.
Quick demo path: 1. Pick a niche and country. 2. Watch the search move through public sources and contact checks. 3. Review kept leads and edit the first outreach draft.
No reveal tax

Priced per search, not per phone

Zero-result searches are refunded. You are not charged ten credits to learn a number is disconnected.

Defensible

Public source on every lead

Each contact route links back to where it was published, so outreach is easy to justify.

Try the math

Price a first search

Use the lead-cost calculator to size a small, honest first test.

Source-linked evidence

Research behind this page

Use these findings as context, not promised results. Each source includes its sample or method and the limitation that matters when applying it.

Industry data-quality analyses (Landbase, Apollo)

How fast B2B contact databases go stale

Aggregated analyses put B2B contact-data decay at roughly 22.5-30% per year - about 2.1% per month - and as high as 70% at fast-moving tech companies, with job-title changes the single biggest driver.

Method
Meta-analysis of multiple third-party data-quality studies and vendor benchmarks.
Use carefully
Decay varies widely by industry, seniority, and how many fields you track, so treat the range as a planning input rather than a fixed number.
Read the original source
Salesforce Research

State of Sales, 7th Edition

Sales reps report spending almost one workday per week prospecting; 92% of sales professionals using AI agents say AI benefits prospecting.

Method
Survey of 4,050 sales leaders, representatives, operations staff, and support professionals across 19 country groups and multiple industries.
Use carefully
The 92% figure only covers respondents already using AI agents and is a perception measure, not a controlled productivity test.
Read the original source
McKinsey & Company

The surprising economics of B2B growth

B2B buyers use an average of ten channels during the purchasing journey, and market leaders are four times more likely to deploy true one-to-one personalization.

Method
Global B2B Pulse survey of nearly 4,000 decision-makers across 13 countries and multiple industries.
Use carefully
The study covers broad B2B buying behavior; it does not isolate cold-email performance or prove that personalization alone causes growth.
Read the original source
Data standard Public contact routes

Results need a usable public email or phone number and enough source context for review.

Review context Source and match context

Each result includes context to help you check why the lead fits before outreach.

User control Editable outreach drafts

Drafts remain editable and should be reviewed for accuracy, relevance, and compliance before sending.

Comparison

Lusha vs Lead Outreach Agent

A side-by-side of the model, not a feature dump. Both tools find contacts; they start from opposite ends of the workflow.

Dimension Lusha Lead Outreach Agent
Pricing model Credits per reveal (phone ~10x email) Per search; zero-result searches refunded
Starting point Database filters / browser extension Plain-language niche prompt
Contact guarantee Reveal first, verify after Only public, contactable leads are shown
Source transparency Aggregated database record Links to the public source per lead
First outreach Not included AI-drafted first email you edit
Best fit Large sales-ops volume Niche, local, founder, and agency campaigns

How Lusha's credit model actually adds up

Lusha's advertised entry price hides a per-reveal cost. Because a revealed phone number costs about ten times a revealed email, one fully revealed contact runs roughly eleven credits - so a 400-credit starter plan covers only about three dozen complete contacts a month. Independent reviews also flag that unused monthly credits roll over only up to a cap, and annual credits reset at year end.

  • Email reveal: about 1 credit; phone reveal: about 10 credits.
  • One full contact: roughly 11 credits.
  • Starter (~400 credits): about 36 complete contacts a month.
  • Lead Outreach Agent charges per search, and refunds credits on zero-result searches instead of charging per reveal.

Accuracy: you pay to find out it's wrong

Lusha publicly cites around 81% data accuracy. That still means roughly one in five records can be outdated - and with a reveal-based model you spend a credit before you learn whether the number connects. Reviewers report more complaints about phone accuracy than email accuracy, including disconnected numbers and wrong departments. B2B contact data decays fast enough (see the research below) that any static database drifts between the day it was collected and the day you dial.

  • Claimed accuracy ~81% - about 1 in 5 records potentially stale.
  • Phone data draws more accuracy complaints than email.
  • A reveal-based model spends a credit before you can verify.

A different starting point: niche in, contactable leads out

Database tools assume you already know which companies to filter for. Lead Outreach Agent starts a step earlier, from a plain-language description of the customer you want - "independent gyms in Belgium that book classes manually," say - and returns businesses that publish a usable contact route, each with the public source and a reason it matched. You review fit before you ever draft outreach, instead of exporting a list and scrubbing it.

  • Start from a niche prompt, not database filters.
  • Every shown lead has a public email or phone.
  • Each lead carries a match reason and its public source.

Where Lusha still makes sense

This is not a claim that a database is useless. If you run a large sales-ops motion, need CRM enrichment at scale, or want a browser extension that reveals a contact on any LinkedIn profile you open, a mature database like Lusha or Apollo is built for that. Lead Outreach Agent is the better fit for niche and local campaigns, founder-led sales, agency client acquisition, and creator or sponsor lists - where relevance and a defensible source matter more than raw volume.

What you actually do with Lead Outreach Agent

The workflow is short on purpose: define the search, watch it move through public sources and contact checks, review the kept leads and their match reasons, then edit the drafted first email and send it from your own tools. You stay responsible for lawful basis, opt-outs, and final review - the app organizes public research and a starting draft, it does not grant permission to contact anyone.

  • Define niche, lead type, and country.
  • Review contactable leads, sources, and match reasons.
  • Edit the AI-drafted first message and send from your own stack.
FAQ

Questions people ask before using this

Is Lead Outreach Agent cheaper than Lusha?

It depends on how you prospect. Lusha charges per reveal and phone numbers cost about ten times an email, so phone-led prospecting gets expensive fast. Lead Outreach Agent charges per search and refunds credits when a search returns nothing, which is usually friendlier for small, targeted campaigns than for high-volume list building.

Does it have a browser extension like Lusha?

No. Lusha's extension reveals a contact on a profile you are already viewing. Lead Outreach Agent works the other way around - you describe the audience and it finds matching businesses with public contact routes, so it is a discovery tool rather than a reveal-on-hover extension.

Where does the contact data come from?

Only from public sources - contact pages, footers, public listings, and profiles - and only leads with a usable public email or phone are shown. Nothing is guessed from private data, and each lead links back to where its contact route was published.

How accurate is the data?

No tool should promise a fixed accuracy number, because B2B contact data decays roughly 22.5-30% a year. Lead Outreach Agent reduces stale-data risk by pulling from live public sources at search time and by recording the source so you can verify before you send.

Can I use it to build large lists?

You can run repeated searches, but it is designed for relevance over raw volume. If you need tens of thousands of records with CRM enrichment, a large database platform is a better fit; if you need reviewed, contactable leads for a specific campaign, this is faster to act on.

Is finding a public email permission to email someone?

No. Public availability is not consent. You remain responsible for lawful basis, clear sender identification, and a working opt-out under the rules that apply to your recipients.

What is the best next step after reading this page?

Start with one narrow search, review the contactability and match reasons, then use the related tools or benchmark pages to decide whether the niche is worth scaling.